Best views, weather, etc. How to test them 👓 SC, Ala. sites look back Betty Ford honored
WASHINGTON
Affordable Care Act

Obamacare popularity highest in nearly seven years as repeal talk mounts

Jayne O'Donnell
USA TODAY

Publicity surrounding the Affordable Care Act's benefits may be meeting supporters' goals. More people view the health law favorably than at any point in nearly seven years.

Pattye McAbee, of Carney, Okla., asks a question of U.S. Rep. Frank Lucas, R-Oklahoma, during a town hall meeting in Chandler, Okla., Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2017. McAbee said that she had voted for Hillary Clinton and wanted Congress to leave Obamacare alone.

That's the main finding of a Kaiser Family Foundation survey out Friday of 1,160 people last week that shows the Affordable Care Act is as popular as it's been since the summer of 2010.

The percent of people with favorable views of the law increased from 43% in December to 48% now. People are still split on whether to repeal the law or not — though far fewer want repeal without details of a replacement plan.

"It’s not surprising that as Democrats have gone on the offense about the benefits of the law for people, support for the law has gone up," says Paul Howard, director of health policy at the free market Manhattan Institute.

More than 1,160 adults were polled Feb. 13-19 for the survey,which has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Prep for the polls: See who is running for president and compare where they stand on key issues in our Voter Guide

A lack of clarity over what the law would be replaced with if repealed strengthens attachment to the ACA, says Howard. Republican infighting weakens support for the repeal effort and supporters of the law have made "effective use of town halls" in congressional districts, he added.

"The devil you know is more popular than the devil you don't," says Howard.

Liz Hamel is director of public opinion and survey research at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

While Democrats and Republicans' opinions of the law haven't changed much, independents seem to have grown more positive about the ACA, says Liz Hamel, Kaiser Family Foundation's director of public opinion and survey research.

"They're most likely reacting to what they’re hearing in the news and the fact that more of the public discussion of late is about what people stand to lose if it is repealed," says Hamel.

The new findings come as insurers and consumers are trying to figure out what to make of Internal Revenue Service guidance on how it would treat tax returns that that appeared to suggest taxpayers without health insurance won’t face penalties at tax time.

In recent years, returns that didn't indicate whether the taxpayer had insurance or an exemption were processed, but that was set to change this year. Based on one of President Trump's executive orders, the IRS now plans to continue processing these returns  and may follow up at a future date.

Read more:

Gabrielle Giffords to lawmakers: 'Have some courage'

Trump: Regulators should remove burdensome Obamacare penalties

"Legislative provisions of the ACA law are still in force until changed by the Congress, and taxpayers remain required to follow the law and pay what they may owe‎," the IRS said.

The insurance industry trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, is urging Congress to approve other incentives to keep people enrolled in insurance if the tax penalties are eliminated. If people aren't required to buy insurance, healthy people are more likely to wait to buy it when they are sick or injured and their premiums couldn't offset the costs of insuring those who need more health care.

Other findings:

• Nearly half of the public worry someone in their family will lose coverage if the ACA is repealed and replaced.

• Substantial majorities say it is important that any ACA replacement plan continue to provide federal funds to states that expanded Medicaid under the law. This was true no matter where people lived or what political party they belong to.

• About two thirds of people prefers status quo over such changes that would limit federal spending while giving states more flexibility to decide who and what to cover.

Featured Weekly Ad